b-random9's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[StomaccAndFriends]

Well this is one of the strangest games I've played in a while. Something about it reminds me of Mario and Luigi Bowsers Inside Story. I'm not a big fan of Mario games generally, but both that game and this one have a similar charm, the way everything jiggles and bounces. Was this intentional.

Besides the game's feel, there are also interesting mechanics at play. Not being able to die but just change form is an interesting mechanic and the collecting different "friends" gives each level a feeling of progression. My first gripe is that I wasn't going "ah ha" as much as I was going "I guess that's what I do"; reason being that it's hard to keep track of what each thing does, more specifically their stats. For example, one puzzle I didn't know that Mr speedy couldn't jump as high as Mr plain block, I just kinda went "I guess he must jump higher because it's the only way to solve this" where as I could have been going "Aha, now I need Mr jumpy." Simply having a way to check each stat would fix this, though somehow I doubt you'd feel that would fit the game. A better approach then may be to A. have their designs better reflect their skills B. have more distinct skills. Perhaps rather than standard high jump, the block jumping higher could have a double jump, or some slight variant on a jump that helps it stand out in the players mind. The size mechanic is a good start.

My second quarrel is with what the game is. Is it a puzzle game, is it a platformer? No idea. The short answer is both but this always raises issues. One part faced me with multiple challenges that I had to keep redoing the first just to beat the second all the while trying to solve a puzzle. HOWEVER, except for maybe 1 or 2 examples where it can become a bit tedious, this isn't really a problem in this game since taking damage/"losing" doesn't reset the puzzle and only pushes you back a little whilst also acting as an augmentation to the puzzle rather than a straight loss. For the most part I think this game actually does a great job of blending puzzling and platforming, not very punishing and everything's on screen so I don't have to overcome platforming/navigation just to find out what I'm doing *cough* Iconoclasts *unconvincing cough*.

I do have some other gripes, the part where I had to wait for the timing to line up between the enemy and the falling block was annoying (FTR, this is the part I complained about earlier), and I'm not sure about the part where you have to jump up into the brown spewy to progress as I'm not really solving anything, yet when I solved it I did more so feel "oh that's cool" rather than frustrated. There's not much I can complain about without it turning positive which overall I think says all it needs to. This game feels childish in a strong sense, everything has googly eyes, it's creative, it's bouncy and energetic and half of it's "flaws" are more endearing than anything. With all that said, even in a kinda shitty mood I managed to enjoy this game which is impressive; so congratulations, you get the seal of approval from a random person on the internet.

joqlepecheur responds:

Hello, you made my day!

You are raising lots of interesting points.

Making things giggle was indeed to give an organic feel. As for the eyes, not being much of an artist I use it to easily show expression.
I am a big fan of Mario but haven't got to play "inside bowser", considering your comment I will probably play it in the near future. So to answer you this was not deliberate, but I guess some means come naturally to achieve some ends.

Stat wise, I indeed would like to avoid any display of numbers. I could have designed an earlier level so that you already have a better feel of heights when you get there. I will see if I can fit something in to have the thought come more naturally.
I am not confident in my ability to have pertinent designs, but I guess I could at least make a green friend shaped more like an I than a square, which could in turn offer level design opportunities.
The double jump idea is brilliant. The only downside is that it needs to be presented to the player somehow.
I am considering adding 12 levels for an alternate adventure (game+ that can be played right away), if I do I will make sure to include double jump for the green friend.

I will tweak level 12 (falling blocs + fast moving little spikey) to try to mitigate that frustration, reduce the cadency of blocs dropping (just enough to mess with player's planification), and I will move things to make the jump over 1st spikey easier.

Thanks for your detailed feedback.

[Undroid]

Whilst the game doesn't do anything glaringly wrong, there's really not much here to classify as interesting. Most if not all mechanics here are quite generic and so there's not really anything to hold my interest. I think there are multiple ways to tackle this, the most common being to have a unique core mechanic and then designing the rest around it. One thing I did like use of the crouch and falling through platforms, having to drop at the right time then duck under the wall was nice, though I'm not sure how much more these were put to use as I stopped playing when I got the dash.

In terms of feel and polish, there were some nice aspects such as scrolling to show the upcoming level. However, a lot of parts could still do with some improving. The player feels very sluggish to control and I think having sound effects for jumping, landing, ect would help. The very low invincibility time was also a bit annoying early on. The first robot I encountered I wanted to see if I could jump on it but the low invinc time cost me 2 hearts, following which came the unexpected laser sending me all the way back to the start of the tutorial which doesn't feel fair or fun at all.

The robots could have also done with some more polish such as sound effects and a firing animation. Also, they seem quite inconsistent in terms of how they act (some flip, some don't) which is quite jarring.

Overall, whilst there are some aspects that are nice and I didn't notice anything glaringly wrong with it, it's an all round fairly generic game with consistency issues.

luisfmodestop responds:

Thank you for your comment! Yes, there are lot tweaks to be done to improve gameplay and game feel. We just didn’t have time to finish all these details in time - thats a 3rd semester university project!

Thank you very much for taking a bit of your time to play our game!

[GAMAZ 1.2 Fix]

I'm not sure what you intention is with putting this out there but since it is, expected to be judged just like any other publicly available game, I'm not going to give it sympathy points if you put it out there with the rest of the games on NG.

For starters, the paddle is the same colour as the background. I imagine this wasn't the case when you were developing it but rather the result of putting it on Newgrounds. However, you can test games on the site before publishing and I really doubt this was a hard fix.

Other than that, it's just pong. The game seems function but it could do with some more feel, I'd recommend this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy0aCDmgnxg) video to get an idea of how.

Having notifications pop up to inform you of winning, losing ect isn't a good way to handle that sort of thing, feedback should really be in game as dealing with notifications is annoying and requires taking myself outside of the game. Also, if I'm not fully scrolled down the game keeps playing so they're popping up as I write this.

Overall, it's what you'd expect from a first game I guess. Everyone starts somewhere so of course with enough work and commitment you will improve. It's good that you were able to actually finish a game as well, that's a good habit to get into as well as putting your games out there but perhaps try and include something unique at least in your next game along with some polish.

ZYEV responds:

Okay, in the next version i'm fix this. Thanks for review.